«

[Xhumed]

Originally Posted by _r.u.s.s.

but france had this law for quite a while already

Probably "Sarkozy" just telling everyone that it was law before it was, Sarkozy = :lecher:

Originally Posted by CrybKeeper

Actually, The service provider is a field I have researched and wrote about.

Nearly all ISP's have a service and mission statement, which will include these lines; Our aim is to provide a secure connection to media content. We are a public Service Provider and considered a public utility.

What this clearly means, is your ISP should pay for a secure service and protect the customer, which is included in the fee to said customer. i.e. We, the end-users, should never have to pay for anti-viral software, subscriptions to parental controls, or any other 3rd party protection, while being provided a secure public utility by an ISP.

In a nutshell, ISP's claims, demand they pay for Norton, not you and I.

This translates to, The very same ISP, should be protecting all sides, including the copyright holder and if necessary, the ISP should also provide insurances.

Further translation: Higher bill from your ISP.

My ISP sent me about ten emails saying how wonderful they are for adding a spam filter to their email system but it's so crap hardly anyone uses it