Well, if we reached this point, I'll have to say that I'm not an anarchist in practice, but an anarchist in soul. I do consider anarchy a superior socio-economic system, but I also know that it can be adopted by the masses only after capitalism finishes its cycle.
I'm convinced that society self-reglates itself and doesn't need impulses from individuals. Also we all know that the change of the system is first done in fact, and only then we need a revolution to change it "de jure". The fact is anarchy is not viable in our current society, nor is communism.
Generally, what I'm trying to say is that there are no real anarchists, because we live in a capitalist society. Also, mainly because of the globalisation and integration our society is currently self-directing toward a similar society, the question is: is it communism or is it anarchy?
Now why anarchy>communism? It's because communism imposes the same standard, norm to all people. That's useless if we take into account the human nature. He always wants more. What if I don't want only bread, I want some oranges too, for example? Here anarchy has a complete advantage...
Well those are my thoughts. I'm not an active anarchist ->I don't want to break windows and steal TVs. That doesn't change a thing. And if you're wondering, wherever individuals are involved, it always ends up being corrupted.
__________________
Don't think about the probabilities. The smallest chance can take us a long way forward. It's not like we have anything else to lose.
|