View Single Post
Old 17-09-2007, 02:55 PM   #7
The Fifth Horseman
FUTURE SCIENCE BASTARD
 
The Fifth Horseman's Avatar


 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Opole, Poland
Posts: 14,276
Default

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(David86 @ Sep 17 2007, 03:41 PM) [snapback]311413[/snapback]</div>
Quote:
So, what are the consequences of their actions?
[/b]
For the moment, only having to bear a badge of shame on the subject within their own Wikipedia article.

Quote:
but weren't they somehow violating the copyright of the user that wrote the article before them? i mean they edited authors work without the authors permission. i know it's not uncommon in Wiki, but it doesn't go with the ethics they are trying to advertise.[/b]
Thing is, copyrights in that meaning do not apply to the content of Wikipedia articles (which is under a public license, IIRC). What they were violating was the neutrality of the article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:COI

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:NPOV
__________________

"God. Can't you people see I'm trying to commit a crime against science and nature here?"
-- Reed Richards
The Fifth Horseman is offline                         Send a private message to The Fifth Horseman
Reply With Quote