«

[Pietafon]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hatsen @ Nov 5 2007, 12:31 PM) [snapback]318295[/snapback]</div>

Sadly my computer can't run it:

300 GB space.
512 MB ram.
6600GT :/
[/b]

Don't worry man
On my Celeron 2,4 Ghz, 512 MB RAM (DDR 1) and GF 7600GT AGP Crysis runs smooth in medium settings

[gregor]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(David86 @ Oct 28 2007, 07:13 PM) [snapback]317601[/snapback]</div>

trees that fall down under your bullets

[/b]

OMG a Delta force feature

I am glad it handles nicely even on slower computers. It has to if they want to selll it a lot.

let's see how the story will go and lets see how Farcry 2 will do (also destructable stuff & trees).

So Far cry was super hard while Crysis will be super easy for 5 year olds? Well actually far cry only hgad a couple of levels that were hard.. but with the others the most annoying part was that if you want to pass them easilly you had to move fast & zoom through the levels quickly and there was actually no time for exploring (exploring was too dangerous). luckilly there is a devmode, but still it's not the same. i mean look at stalker. even without cheats you can explore, yet it can be chalenging enough to keep you on your toes while you are doing that. you never know when a hoard of mutatns will attack...

[Dave]

I said that Far Cry seems harder than Crysis, not that it is the hardest game I have ever played.

If I'm not wrong the game will be released near the 16th of this month, but guys pay attention, you don't need Vista or DirectX10 to run it with high quality, some mad official programmers have hidden "Very high detail levels" under XP, normally you can enable them only under Vista...but there's a way to apply them under XP .
A friend of mine did this (with a better machine obviously)...graphically speaking it's another game...really :w00t:

[Blood-Pigggy]

Well the developer doesn't know squat about game balance. Far Cry's difficulty turned it into crap and if Crysis is really this easy it's going to be crap too.

[Hatsen]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(J@nek @ Nov 5 2007, 01:33 PM) [snapback]318303[/snapback]</div>

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Hatsen @ Nov 5 2007, 12:31 PM) [snapback]318295[/snapback]

Sadly my computer can't run it:

300 GB space.
512 MB ram.
6600GT :/
[/b]

Don't worry man
On my Celeron 2,4 Ghz, 512 MB RAM (DDR 1) and GF 7600GT AGP Crysis runs smooth in medium settings
[/b][/quote]
Cool, maybe i should upgrade my computer a bit?

(It's cheaper, to just buy a new one! )

[The Punisher]

I run it on high, no lag.
The game rocks.

[Burger Meister]

so you are saying it could run at least on low using my

Pentium D 2.66GHZ @ Dual Core
1gb ram
XFX GeForce 8600GT XXX 256mb

Everybody was saying how crazy this game was, I assumed I couldn't run it?

[Dave]

You can run it without problems, but with low/medium details it's similar to FarCry.
Like I said if you can run it on "very high" you see another game...incredible.

[Burger Meister]

I didn't mind far cry's graphics, so I guess I'll enjoy it then. Though I have a problem... what to buy... Call of Duty 4 or Crisis? I have no clue!

EDIT: I also need another gb of ram, so I am really stumped on what to buy...

[Dave]

Did you try Call of Duty 4 demo? You should before buy it
The Engine is pratically the same of CoD2 and the gameplay is really similar...so if you liked it you'll enjoy this ...but nothing new. You won't have problems running it, because graphically is not so "heavy".
About gameplay you'll see new things because this is a modern war game (In CoD2 you play the WWII).

Maybe The new Medal of Honor is better...

I can't compare Crysis with CoD4, it's two steps forward...