«

[Luchsen]

At the site of the German National Geographic magazine, you can vote for one of three covers for the next but one edition. I always was annoyed with the outcome. (When it wasn't IP dependent yet, I even voted two hopeless pictures to winners. Later I didn't feel like disconnecting my router a thousand times, and didn't went on the site anymore to not have to see which pictures were dismissed.)

So I ask you to vote here for the right picture. (I would also take the middle one, but we have to accumulate our votes.) The left one is more than the right-top half just blurred, bottom-left is an optically not very special quacker, and the overly large catchline simply has an even more exposed DARWIN and is in bad sensationalism style. It has the most votes, though... (Pavlov anyone?)

Thanks.