|
![]() |
#1 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shella, Kenya
Posts: 1,578
|
![]() A rating from one to five for a games means that games that are not alike quality wise will get the same marks. I would suggest using a one to ten mark system. That way there is a more easily recognizable system for good versus bad games and leaves room in the middle for more mediocre games.
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#2 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Telford, England
Posts: 1,303
|
![]() yes, 3, 4 and 5 just imply good, 1 and 2 imply all bad(well to me..)
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#3 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 308
|
![]() I dunno, I kinda like it. Even just 3 numbers (1 = bad, 2 = medium, 3 = good) would be enough for me. I mean the ratings are pretty much "matter-of-opinion" anyway - depending on how many people like the genre and such... :?
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#4 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ranelagh, Ireland
Posts: 1,577
|
![]() Yeah, that's why I didn't want to introduce the 10 marks system. Its just too wide for me. What would decide between a 6 and a 7? I just can't place that much detail into marking. Also, all the games are pretty much rated 4 or 5 because I have only put quality games on the site so far. When I'm out of good games, and start adding bad ones, hopefully you'll start seeing ones and twos, and thus decide more easily which games are good, and which are not
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#5 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() 1 to 5 seems fine!!
__________________
From the ashes of the past, EchoRing cometh... http://www.echoring.co.uk EchoRing Version 4.0B |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#6 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: ,
Posts: 8
|
![]() 1 to 5 marks are fine, but I want to talk 'bout something else: there's not enough games, I already downloaded and finished most of the games you can find on Abandonia... And what 'bout Caesar and Star trek: The 25th anniversarry, I'm sure many would like to see them on Abandonia...
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#7 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Telford, England
Posts: 1,303
|
![]() Hmm I might have Star Trek 25th anniversary somewhere.. My Mum is a star Trek fan
__________________
I liked the old forum.. =/ |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#8 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Shella, Kenya
Posts: 1,578
|
![]() Quote:
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#9 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() I think it would be a good ideea that every game had it's own forum room to disscus it.In the review screen of the respective game, a small link(Disscus this game in the forum) would lead you to the forum.
If there is no topic named after the game, a new one would be made, named after the game, else if there is another forum room in wich the game is being disscused the link will lead you to that room.In this new room, all aspects(troubleshooting, walkthrough, hints, etc.) would be disscused. Pretty simple and efficient, no? |
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
#10 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Posts: 308
|
![]() I agree. I've been kinda doing this manually for all of my reviews (all 2 of them), but it would be great if it was kind of build in.
|
||
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Little suggestion... | einstein999999 | Old Suggestions | 3 | 13-09-2008 09:27 AM |
Just A Suggestion | Takeshi | Old Suggestions | 1 | 15-12-2005 01:44 AM |
Suggestion | Rinforzando | Old Suggestions | 12 | 24-09-2005 12:35 PM |
Suggestion | Iron_Scarecrow | Old Suggestions | 34 | 04-02-2005 07:27 AM |
|
|
||
  |