«

[Microprose Veteran]

Video

Your comments please.

[Havell]

Most of the links on that site lead to nowhere.

[Microprose Veteran]

Did you see the video? It's a direct link.

I wasn't asking about the site it is on.

Do you have any comments on the video?

[Havell]

Nothing new. It would take a while for the floors to crumble and planes fly at hundreds of miles per hours so there tends not to be much left after a crash, especially if it is straight into a building. Besides, there is footage of the plane hitting.

[Yobor]

It's certainly fakeable if the info is incorrect.

[Microprose Veteran]

There is footage of the plane hitting? The only footage I have seen is something unidentifiable (either flying extremely low or perhaps it was just something on the camera lens) and then there's a big explosion.

Did you notice all the light posts in front of the Pentagon? Amazing how a low-flying airliner could avoid hitting those with its wings. And, like the WTC planes, those pilots sure were top-ace gung ho experts. To think that they only trained in Cessna-type aircraft (4-seater).

[punch999]

its not that hard to crash into the wtc. i mean come on enough with the conspiricy theories. and btw there is footage of all of these events

[Microprose Veteran]

Well, show the footage then!

And why is it you people have no comment to what Jamie McIntyre says he saw close up?

It's not hard to crash into the Pentagon, dodging those light posts? If you say so...

[Havell]

Well the plane didn't skim along the ground for miles did it? It just piled into the building (which is really quite large and hard to miss).

EDIT: SPAG

[Microprose Veteran]

Are you familiar with handling characteristics of large airliners?

You don't just 'dive into a target' like those dive bombers do in the movies.

For a large airliner to hit the Pentagon you need to have an approach similar to a landing. According to the official story (as shown in computer animation on National Geography) the plane went 'straight in,' nose first into the wall. Meaning they did skim the ground. Otherwise the plane would have hit the Pentagon with its underside, nose pointing up. The Pentagon may be large but it's not that high in relation to a big airliner. So it's amazing they still hit the wall, instead of 'touching down' on the part with the biggest 'hit-chance:' the roof.

And why did CNN Pentagon-reporter Jamie McIntyre say he could not find any piece of wreckage that indicated a large airliner had crashed? Why didn't McIntyre see any parts of the wings or tail?