View Single Post
Old 02-04-2011, 01:12 PM   #7
wackypanda
Abandonia nerd

 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: ,
Posts: 51
Default

There is this Mozilla bug report from 1998, which confirms that this behaviour is (was?) intended. I haven't found out if this is due to W3C specs, although the conversation in the report implies that it was the spec back then.

Edit: Seems it is also a HTML5 spec, although that spec recommends that a missing image icon be displayed as well. As it is, a CSS extended property has to be added (but darned if I can figure out where) to force the icon to appear.

Last edited by wackypanda; 03-04-2011 at 11:15 AM.
wackypanda is offline                         Send a private message to wackypanda
Reply With Quote