We already have that, my friend... There is more to this forum then what meets the eye

hey don't forget the poor, frustrated mods :evil:

As far as discussing mod(i can't say about admin, it's not my field) decisions in public, i can't say i have something against it.Unfortunately almost ALWAYS, when discussing a mod/admin decission, the result will be flaming, followed by warns.That's the problem here.Whereas a PM is far more private, and you can talk some sense into person, without having to answer to ten guys at a time.Like now, i sense the pressure building up between Braindead and Anubis... :yawn:

No one is forced to stay, but no one should really go because of bad use of :adminpower:

So, why for example Picard has posted his answer after Data closed the topic?

And why would Data close topic about Underdogs? (Are we scared from their comments or something else?)

So, now if I like to post what I think about underdogs, I should contact Data to reopen it, or open new topic to post it, and then finally, bump some old topic to post it.

I really do not see why that topic was closed.

As for problems, I usually contact Kosta if I encounter them. Not that I don't trust you guys, but because his word is final, and there is no need to go trough 2-3 complains. Or in other case I'd just move away, as you already suggested.


Again, thanks for explanation for how playground works....


@ Titan - I know you guys have that, just suggested what to use. ;)

@ Omuletzu - it would be full time job to put sense in some people, one thing at the time...

Uhm... :blink:


I don't think we've met. I am Tom. Have you seen my pet? He is really cute. You can pet him if you like. His name is Titan, and he is a Site Gnome.

The underdogs topic was closed because the question to the answer was given (underdogs being slow because a lot of users eating the bandwidth away).
Picard just added the fact that they've had a recent update with new games (this is technical support related as you might know or not know there had not been an update since start of the year)

I see no reason why you should venture your opinion in the underdogs thread as the thread is in the technical support section.

@ Tom

LOL LOL LOL

You better stay on the topic, as Briandead seems a bit fussy and might give you a warning for off-topic. LOL LOL LOL :sniper: :Tom:


@ Braindead

I believe this is BB, and its idea is to exchange thoughts.... You as BB master should know that. And yes, even in support forum.

BTW, I don’t like your tone from the first post. It’s not friendly.

irritated I suppose? irrigated is to do with drainage of water in sandy areas... :whistle:

I'm not irritated I'm just withlaying your arguments.

I fixed it, and you got your answers too...

And yes, there is another reason underdogs are slow. Because it takes a while to browser to fight all spy and ad attacks, and million of pop-ups.

But according to you, just to many users is the problem.... (as there was not a lot of users already on that site)

it is true ads are being shown but this does not fetch the bandwidth on server side just a bit on the client side, the client side isn't the bottle neck though.
As you might notice downloading from the underdogs is very slow which should prove to you that the problem lies on server side not on client side.

Only if downloads are keept on the same server as the web site, which is not very true.

Same things is happaning with www.gamespot.com where you have to wait couple sec till all pop-ups try to open.

But this is just one of examples for closing the topics, without good reason.