![]() |
Quote:
|
The BAT only changes the directory (better said: tries to) and executes the CIV.EXE. Shouldn't make a difference. :)
|
Ah, yeah, I just looked at it. You're right, it shouldn't make a difference.
jonahjuice: Listen to your good fellow Luchsen and try Civ.exe. |
Jonah - if you still can't figure it out or get it to run, there's Civ for Windows which is okay.
It doesn't immerse you as much as the Dos version, though, as windows is open with all its bright flashy lights and alluring internet browsers, filled with ladies. Kinda distracting... |
Quote:
|
The EXE should open files relative to the directory itself is located. Anyway, the BAT can't change to the specified directory since it is (fortunately for the BAT) non-existent, and just runs the EXE which is (fortunately for the BAT) in the same directory as the BAT. But the main thing is to have a happy jonahjuice. ^_^
|
Quote:
You can test this somewhat if you have access to a DOS machine or a win3x/9x DOS window. Create a batch file containing only the DIR command, and put it in a subdir, then run it from the root dir. You'll find it list files in the root dir rather than in the subdir the batch file is located in. As for DOSBox, I'm not sure (haven't really needed it with a '98SE machine), but if it truly emulates DOS, then I'd think the same principle would apply. :cheers: |
Now I understand what you mean. But you are not intended to run executables out of other directories per command input. Even the directory change via a BAT wouldn't work if executed from another directory.
|
Quote:
However, if DOSBox doesn't emulate the DOS dir/file structure, then I can understand why it wouldn't work the same. Sorry for any added confusion. :blush: |
Quote:
Yes it works. Use this: cd\xxxx Notice the \ not a space. ...... learn the basic dos commands ....... :p |
The current time is 01:20 PM (GMT) |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.