You assume there'd be tihngs to loot. think, depending on how fast everything spread, everything may already be looted by the time you get to it, unless the infection spreads UBER FAUST in which case no one would have had time to loot

Threads: Dis Shit? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQo0BQM3OlQ

dude watching this scares me! Im afraid of the nuclear apocalypse now, TC :p

YES CUT ALL THEYRE HEADS OFF!!!!!!!!!!

I voted for Zombies without a doubt!
Can't stand invisible radiation which is everywhere (for the next 10.000 years)
all the hot chicks would be horribly mutated in nuclear fallout whereas in zombie land you could save them :)

And on the next they, they will try to eat you... and I don't mean it in a good way :p

I think I'd prefer nuclear fallout against me having to kill all my friends, relatives, loved ones, pets, etc. Z day may leave the world intact, but with everyone eating up everyone else, there wouldn't be much more left from technology or society than after a nuclear blast.

after watching The day After (an american one made in 1983) and where the wind blows (a cartoon one from 1986) i am now throughouly afraid of the nuclear apocalypse.

If I had to choose? Well, none of those options are appealing.

I'd however choose a zombie apocalypse... Since you actually have a chance to survive it.

I don't think you guys realize how games are... Well... games. In fallout, the hero start in secluded vault which was supposedly (badly) shielded from the radiation... After so long that they are actually the second generation of people and their grandparents are already dead

The chance that someone writing here would be included in such a situation would be infinitesimal.

Nukes!

Nuclear winter would cancel global warming = win-win

Both scenarios contains loads of guns, so I'm happy.

zombies! because my dad has 35 guns in his collection and i assume a ton of ammo (i also assume that these zombies cant run and that i can fly)