MVP - What is wrong with you?

Clinton was basically persecuted for both of his terms by the Republicans who were trying to convict him of something that isn't even a crime.

He made the USA billions upon billions from a depression.

Nuclear energy is the cleanest viable alternative at the moment, at least he did get an oil or coal power station.

Both parties are similar because that's what US politics is like. You either vote 6 of one or half a dozen of the other, really.

And I'll have you know that anyone who has ever been in any secret intelligence groups will be paranoid. Same with judges. Because they know that the world is out to get them.

** This was a bnp political broadcast

which is why hydroelectrics and wind power is (small) big buisness at the moment. i live within visual range of some of the cleanest most viable sources of energy, a turbine.
japan went into solar. the problem with solar is that the silcon market is pretty much owned by chip manufacturers so in order to turn out profit companys have to use silicon offshards as strips. rather than larger smoother cuts. its now much harder to make hi grade panels for profit scince the computer market massively expanded. also there is a lot of energy to be harnessed from the wind, and the tide area turbines are a good idea that with more time will grow into serios projects. its growing. becuse i think slowy most of the world is waking up. germany has huge wind turbine installations as well. japan is having to adapt from a strong silicon bias in there reknewable energy policys, but i think gradually the world is waking up to the reknewable energy idea. plus a general proliferation of low voltage devices and low voltage light bulbs will help.

we dont need the nuke :Titan:
cnd :ok:

Hmm... I dunno. The UK is a bit slow to cotton on and wind turbines are something that most people object to (aparentely they 'ruin the countryside') for some reason.

Maybe...

Anyway, why was my comment BNP-esque?

There was no prejudice about immigrants, nothing to do with guns and also nothing about national service.

heh. nice one. you know who i mean. do you know the big problem about it. a proposel goes up in a village. all the part time residents kick up a stink becuse they are worried about the value to there property. i think legislation needs to be passed so that where wind turbindes are viable they can bloody well build them, nimbys be damned. the only way to slowly phase down rectors is to focos on tuirbines. (and the renewable resources. why not bring in fuel cells faster. we rely on crude oil for a huge amount of other chemicals, it is not fiction that areas with nuke plants near by have higher background radiations and hier rates of birth defects. you dont swim in the rivers or seas near these things folks,, no no no.
i really wish someone here hadnt put the link to that chernobly site on with that motor bike nuttah. has reawoken my fascination / revulsion LOL.

Or we could create synthetic fossil fuels. I bet that it wouldn't be too hard to do with the right catalysts etc.

Instead of 100,000 years for oil and coal, 1 year is more like it. That would do, but people proabably can't be arsed to try.

And for your information, areas with wind turbines have more sliced-up birds... THE HORROR! THE HORROR!

that explains the lack of swarms of small birds in this area scince they bought in the turbines.

No, I'm not saying the Democrats and Republicans are in some sort of conspiracy. I said that they were two faces of the same coin. That's no way figure of speech for conspiracy. People say, for instance in the States, that Michael Moore and Anne Coulter are two faces of the same coin. I disagree, because Coulter is clearly a hatemonger while Moore merely showed damning documented evidence against Bush.

Moore used to support Clinton untill he found out the man was a fraud (look at all the nice things he did for the conservatives, look at his little wars). He also pointed out that the Democrats couldn't be counted on. He did however support the Democrats during last elections because he wanted to get rid of Bush any which way.

But Michael Moore only depicted Bush as a moron in his documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11." According to more outspoken anti-Bush activists like Alex Jones, Moore did not even adress the real issues regarding "9/11." When asked why he had not included the NORAD stand down issue, Moore literally replied, "That would be unamerican." Personally I think Moore still has some faith in the system. More faith than I have.

Anyway, the Democrats talk what their supporters like to hear, but when a vote is called, they vote with the Republicans on many issues where they should have voted against. That is clearly double-talk (reference to "1984").

They have a saying: with the Republicans they tell you they're gonna screw you and they do screw you. With the Democrats, they tell you they're not gonna screw you but they screw you anyway.